WordCamp Miami 2013 Feedback

8629422871_95ee87bc47_b

Although WordCamp Miami happened in early April, the feedback forms weren’t sent until almost four months later. As a WordCamp organizer, I would normally say that you should send the typical WordCamp feedback form anytime from the very hour the camp ends to 1-2 weeks later. Four months is normally too long and admittingly myself and the organizers of WordCamp Miami let this fall through the cracks, and next year we’ll be formally asking for feedback closer to the event’s closing.

But putting aside the “better late than never” logic, it was actually INTERESTING to see what stuck in people’s minds months later. And personally, at least this time around, i’m much more interested in that. Months later the feelings you have for an event are what really matter and what i think primarily direct to ever going to that event again in the future. It’s easy to remember that “the lunch line was slow” a week after the conference, but what thoughts and memories stay with you if you think about the event again in half a year? If it’s overall good feelings, than mission accomplished.

So, although this feedback is late, i still think it warrants consideration and sharing. Not to mention we did get emails, personal notes, message via social media, and tons of direct commentry weeks after the event. Personally, i had eight people approach me at WordCamp San Francisco in late July and told me how much they enjoyed the event (and that was without my prompting!). Continue reading “WordCamp Miami 2013 Feedback”

WordCamp Europe’s Selection Process

I’m a little late to this, but I really found the WordCamp Europe Demographics and Selection Process to be very interesting. I wish more WordCamps put something like this out – maybe something not to this level of detail, but at least stating a general thinking of how speakers were selected. If you put guidelines out in public – especially BEFORE your call for speakers – you should have a better selection of speakers to choose from. Also it can always help those who DIDN’T get selected to determine WHY. I would like to think everyone applying to speak for WordCamps have degree of maturity, but you would be surprised something what some people think in their heads if they aren’t selected for a presentation (and especially if they aren’t told directly why).

Anyway, back to Europe. I found myself nodding as I reading this – everything made sense and would be things I would be looking for if I was throwing an “overseas” event like this. I especially like this statement:

Lots of talented people were turned down. It was a difficult process and there was lots of back and forth discussion to get it right.

For WordCamp Miami, it’s becoming harder and harder to decide on speakers for the event – and this is when the event has grown from a one-day to a three (even four) day event. For WordCamp Miami 2013, we had over 100 applications (not individual people, but it was close). We turned ALOT of people down.

The other thing I thought was interesting about the selection process for Europe is that you don’t see sex (male/female) mentioned at all. No mention of trying to balance men vs. women or trying to get a good “man to woman” ratio. As it should be. Getting a balanced group of talented people that represent your area (and beyond) is the focus. It was the same for WordCamp Miami. I get asked “how many women spoke at your event?”. Like that’s a badge of honor, I suppose? Honestly, I couldn’t say off the top of my head. I look at men/women as people – so I could tell you how many PEOPLE spoke at the event.

In closing, let’s get more public disclosure on the selection process (and even stats) of those applying and accepted to more WordCamps. For 2014, I’m planning on making something public for WordCamp Miami’s selection process when the time comes.

Collection of WordCamp San Francisco RoundUp/Reviews

I originally posted these on wcsf.wparmchair.com, but it got too long.

WordCamp San Francisco Job Postings

I’m currently at WordCamp San Francisco, and got here early so I took some high res pics of the “looking to hire” whiteboards here and posting them for those not at #wcsf (or those simply not able to stand that long in front of the whiteboard). This is how the board looked before doors opened on Day 2 (Saturday, July 23rd). I have also copied down the information here, although i can’t confirm it’s 100% accurate.

[awesome_horizontal_line]

Looking to hire:

  • WPEngine.com/career
  • – “North Bay” Krosk.ā„¢
  • – haikodeck.com/jobs (3 openings)
  • quizlet.com
  • funcheap.com (looking for plugin developer + UI/UX) johnny@funcheap.com
  • automattic.com/jobs (12 openings)
  • Android Developer (jobs@emntopressed.com)
  • ticketfly.com (looking for multisite web debs) brandyeticketfly.com start.ticketfly.com
  • mediatemple.net is hiring
  • paidmembershipspro.com (plugin dev + support) @jasoncoleman
  • infomedia.com
  • pmcworld.com
  • 10up.com creative/dev/PM/sysadmin
  • WerkPress.com
  • brainstormedia.com/team
  • Modern Tribe (freelancers only) http://tri.be
  • www.betssondreamteam.com
  • WordPress designer (bourncreative.com/jobs)
  • Exygy.com
  • WP Developer (info@elefintdesigns.com)
  • VOCE Communcations (junior developer)
  • thedma.com.au (looking for gun website designers, freelancers)
  • jobs@vidcaster.com (WP Theme, design/developer, part time)
  • sharethis.com (engineers, project managers, scientists)
  • brainstormmedia.com/team
  • Looking for UI designer (freelance) @nonajnz
  • account management directer sales at Zedo in SF. buddy@zedo.com
  • Move to Norway! metronet.no/codepoet
  • www.openhand.org / e-news@openhand.org
  • WooCommerce troubleshooter needed jmek66@gmail.com
  • mediast.com seeking freelancers
  • Organic Themes Seeking Developer (Live In Hawaii) jeff@organicthemes.com

[awesome_horizontal_line]

 

 

 

photo 2 photo 1

Armchair WordCampers Now Have Their Own Site

Not sure if anyone was using the term “Armchair WordCampers” before me, but I’ve been using the term on Twitter when there are WordCampers you can monitor online. Monitoring WordCamps online isn’t close to being at the event, but some conferences have great coverage. Both pictures and useful/humorous tweets. Monitoring a conference via hashtag is ok, but not the best experience for many conferences. You might miss some action happening on other social networks, plus watching TweetDeck make my eyes go nuts.

So I keep working on my “wparmchair” theme, which had it’s beginnings as the WordPress 10th Anniversary site. It existed prior to that in various forms too.

In any case, I bought wparmchair.com and hosted WordCamp Seattle’s social presence (with blessing from organizers) this year. Now i’ve upgraded the theme a bit for WordCamp San Francisco. Here’s the site.

Here’s the improvement, in case anyone cares or is watching:

  • Instagram Video: If you shoot video on Instragram, you can see the video on the site now just like Vine videos.
  • HTML5 fullscreen added. There’s a link below the “status message” if you have a sharp eye. Fullscreen is nice if you want to project the live stream of items on a large monitor or projector.
  • “View Only Photos” – See all the Twitter, Instagram, Flickr, and user-submitted photos in a nice gallery.
  • Featured Posts Slider – I normally don’t like these, but it’s a nice way to see the best of what you’ve missed in the last hour or two. It might change in the future, i’m not completely happy with it.
  • Retweets – Retweet button allows you to do an oldschool retweet. It’s convenient enough.
  • Livestream Support – You can show a livestream video instead of a featured posts slider (however WCSF live streams are paid only so of course those won’t be on this site).

This site or concept isn’t meant to replace live streaming – mainly those already glued to their social media streams. IĀ encourageĀ anyone not physically attending WordCamp San Francisco to buy a live stream sticket. And maybe drop in on Armchair WordCampers too.

Note: Keep in mind things are in “beta”. At times, i’m wearing a pinkĀ sombrero. I can see the site fine (minus nav bar issues) on an iPhone. Don’t judge.